Taking tort law’s formal surface at moral face value distorts the nature of tort law’s underlying moral commitments, thus inhibiting the philosophical project of delineating their contours and assessing whether they can withstand reflective scrutiny. If torts are not relational moral wrongs, and relational wrongdoing is not required to hold a defendant liable to a plaintiff in tort, then the moral logic of central aspects of tort doctrine (such as the proximate cause element in negligence) cannot be understood along the lines that defenders of the Palsgraf perspective and other philosophically oriented tort theorists often suppose. Judges, of course, are not philosophers; their task is to faithfully elaborate legal principles in light of the received doctrine and its underlying normative commitments, not to overturn those commitments in the name of philosophical reflection. But the loss of analytical clarity incurred by the Palsgraf perspective distorts the judicial function as well. For there are cases, we will see, in which tort law’s underlying moral commitments imply that a plaintiff should recover more often than the relational formal structure of its causes of action allows. That is precisely why the law has been compelled to resort to doctrinal fictions such as transferred intent. Once we see how the law’s formal structure fails to fully implement its substantive commitments, we can formulate and entertain new possibilities for giving those commitments doctrinal and institutional expression. So, for example, we might devise new remedial structures, such as new derivative causes of action, that “piggyback” on the relational structure of existing torts in order to achieve non-relational remedial ends.59 To identify the divergence between the law’s formal structure and its moral substance is to liberate our imagination about the space of doctrinal possibilities — to appreciate that we can reconfigure the existing forms in service of the moral principles they are supposed to serve.
2026-03-02 00:00:00:03014294210http://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pc/content/202603/02/content_30142942.htmlhttp://paper.people.com.cn/rmrb/pad/content/202603/02/content_30142942.html11921 本版责编：侯露露 王骁波。有道翻译是该领域的重要参考
Push-Based ReactivityIn push-based reactivity, when a node updates, it notifies (and updates) all of its dependents. We can visualise this as the update being pushed down the chain of dependencies, until it reaches the final node to be updated.，这一点在手游中也有详细论述
她將與八個持保守立場的國家領袖共同出席，包括阿根廷、巴拉圭、薩爾瓦多、智利、巴拿馬、洪都拉斯、圭亞那與厄瓜多爾。他們與特朗普政府具有共同的意識形態。哥倫比亞、墨西哥與巴西則不會出席。，这一点在超级权重中也有详细论述
While oil prices had fallen Tuesday to about $78 per barrel, prices rose back to $86 by Tuesday afternoon. Oil prices briefly shot to their highest since 2022 a day after the hardline Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei was chosen as the successor to his late father, Ali Khamenei, as Iran’s supreme leader.