In the sort of case at hand, defenders of the Palsgraf perspective have suggested, liability to the parent should not be imposed.232 That is because recognizing a duty of care to the parent would be incompatible with the therapist’s fiduciary obligations to his patient, which require that his attention in treating her be focused exclusively on her interests rather than the interests of third parties.233 Not only may the therapist not take care as to the interests of others, he must not take care as to the interests of others. So there is no duty of care to others, such as a parent, on which the parent might found a claim to redress if she is injured by the therapist’s mistreatment of her child.
Кадр: Sunrise / YouTube
，这一点在91吃瓜中也有详细论述
Кадыров назвал не имеющими оправдания действия войск Ирана08:48，详情可参考传奇私服新开网｜热血传奇SF发布站｜传奇私服网站
Марина Совина (ночной редактор)
Mouse & Profiles (Page 1)